St Albans District Council threaten government's Park Street rail freight decision with court battle

Borehamwood Times: Council threaten government rail freight decision with court battle Council threaten government rail freight decision with court battle

St Albans District Council has threatened to take the Government’s decision on the rail freight terminal near Radlett to the High Court.

The council has written to Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government Eric Pickles, asking him to reconsider his decision to agree the huge rail terminal in Park Street.

In September last year Mr Pickles agreed to look at the rail freight plans in conjunction with a similar appeal in Colnbrook in Slough.

But in December he changed his mind and decided not to call them in for reconsideration.

His decision has been met with outrage by people in the area, who have been fighting the proposals to develop the former Radlett Aerodrome site for years.

This week the district council branded Mr Pickles' decision as "flawed" and threatened to challenge it legally.

Mike Lovelady, head of legal at the council, says in the letter that he will be forced to take the decision to judicial review in the High Court if the department does not reconsider it.

In the letter, which was sent on January 18, Mr Lovelady said: "The council notifies you that the decision at the present time is flawed.

"The errors in the decision are allied to the errors which have been made in the Secretary of State’s decision not to conjoin the Radlett appeal with the Colnbrook appeal."

In September Mr Pickles decided the two schemes should be heard together because they "raise similar and inter-related issues".

He said that the decision on the development in Park Street site may have a significant bearing on his determination on Colnbrook and conjoining the two would lead to a more coherent and consistent decision-making process.

Mr Lovelady also criticised the rail freight proposals for not fully considering the impact of building on Green Belt land.

He said: "It was, moreover, a decision which failed to deal adequately, or at all, with the proper policy basis for considering the national policy position in respect of Green Belt issues by which the need to establish very special circumstances is made a central consideration."

News of the council’s action has been welcomed by the thousands of residents who have been fighting against the rail freight project.

Cathy Bolshaw, co-ordinator for STRiFE, the campaign group working against the development, showed her support for the council’s action.

She said: "This is good news.

"We’re very glad that they are taking such a proactive response.

"It is the next stage forward."

The group set up a petition against the development which has now collected more than 5,500 signatures.

St Albans’ MP Anne Main said: "I completely agree with the council’s decision; there was no explanation of the about turn in the secretary of state’s position given his strong support for conjoined inquires mere months before.

"I, along with the council, wrote to the Secretary of State to support conjoined inquires as we believe that seen side by side, it strengthens our argument.

"I do not understand why he did not follow through with conjoining the inquiries and we have been given no reason why he did not. What changed?

"I am suspicious that it had more to do with national economic strategy than planning policy.

"We continue to fight until the very end. We will explore every avenue in parliament and outside to expose the decision making process."

The council has requested a response from the department within seven days.

Comments (2)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

10:36pm Wed 23 Jan 13

Reader (R) says...

Another waste of taxpayers cash. A couple of years ago the electric supply was upgraded for the bedpan rail line, the writing was on the wall then.
Another waste of taxpayers cash. A couple of years ago the electric supply was upgraded for the bedpan rail line, the writing was on the wall then. Reader (R)

9:04am Thu 24 Jan 13

TFEB says...

I cannot see waht this has to do with the upgraded electricity supply, that was as the old supply could not support multiple12 carriage trains.

Future freight trains, if this site goes ahead, are likely to be diesel as the track is only electrified as far as Bedford.

The track is nearly full to capacity now, so any freight trains added are going to cause congestion unless they run overnight - which is another problem.
I cannot see waht this has to do with the upgraded electricity supply, that was as the old supply could not support multiple12 carriage trains. Future freight trains, if this site goes ahead, are likely to be diesel as the track is only electrified as far as Bedford. The track is nearly full to capacity now, so any freight trains added are going to cause congestion unless they run overnight - which is another problem. TFEB

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree