Roads to be 'intolerable' after Park Street terminal built, say Elstree and Borehamwood Greenbelt Society

Borehamwood Times: Ann Goddard with other rail freight campaigners Ann Goddard with other rail freight campaigners

Drivers will be faced with “mammoth” traffic jams when a new freight terminal is built near Radlett, according to campaigners.

Despite being six miles from the Park Street terminal, the Elstree Greenbelt Society said it will have a “dramatic effect” on cars passing through Borehamwood.

Under the plans, by developer HelioSlough, five big warehouses and a railway line will be built near Park Street.

But campaigners say this will cause a 20 per cent rise in traffic in St Albans, Radlett and Borehamwood – with around 1500 heavy good drivers using the local roads.

Ann Goddard, of Deacons Hill Road, Elstree, called the plans “crazy” and said both areas would be blighted by noise, light and “lung destroying diesel fumes”.

The 79-year-old said: “The traffic tailbacks here are bad enough as it is, but this will make it so much worse. These plans threaten day-long gridlock and mammoth traffic jams on Watling Street.

“The new terminal will be generally awful and unpleasant for anyone in the area. It is wrongly situated.

“A beautiful patch of land will be lost forever.”

Under the plans, a new bridge linking the terminal and the M25 will be built – as well as work on a new roundabout on the A414 to accommodate the extra traffic flow.

But Mrs Goddard, who has six grandchildren, said the new roads would “render life intolerable” for anyone in the area.

Society member Pat Strack – who is also the Mayor of Borehamwood – said: “I am worried because there are so many changes to be made to the rail network.

“The overheard bridges are not big enough and some are not on the right side – so trains will have to go to Cricklewood to do a loop and come to Park Street again.

“This is an ill-conceived idea and has been forced through by a political ideologue without considering the people who are going to be affected by it the most.” “

“There is enough congestion on the trains as it is, this will make it so much worse.”

Another society member, Ken Herbert, was left feeling riled after Eric Pickles gave the plans the green light in December – without holding an inquiry as originally promised.

The 68-year-old Theobold Street resident, said: “The freight wagons will not be able to pass through the tunnels on the railway line. The whole thing is a complete shambles.

“We do not need a freight terminal here as we do not have high levels of unemployment – so people will be driving in from elsewhere making the roads impossible.”

Comments (1)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

3:35pm Tue 12 Feb 13

Reader (R) says...

I wish people would stop scaremongering and tell it how it will be:

When in full operation only 24 trains a day will use the site (12 in and 12 out). Freight trains already use the midland line so no tunnel upgrading is required.

With the major share of terminal generated traffic leaving via a link to the A414 there will be no local HGV traffic. The plans even state that HGV's will be barred from using the A5183 AND Harper Lane.

As for the terminal looking unsightly, you can't see it from the surrounding roads network. And finally, included in the plans are provision of a ParkStreet/Frogmore by-pass which will REDUCE local traffic and make journey times shorter for local people.

JUST SAY IT AS IT WILL BE AND NOT AS YOU THINK IT SHOULD BE!
I wish people would stop scaremongering and tell it how it will be: When in full operation only 24 trains a day will use the site (12 in and 12 out). Freight trains already use the midland line so no tunnel upgrading is required. With the major share of terminal generated traffic leaving via a link to the A414 there will be no local HGV traffic. The plans even state that HGV's will be barred from using the A5183 AND Harper Lane. As for the terminal looking unsightly, you can't see it from the surrounding roads network. And finally, included in the plans are provision of a ParkStreet/Frogmore by-pass which will REDUCE local traffic and make journey times shorter for local people. JUST SAY IT AS IT WILL BE AND NOT AS YOU THINK IT SHOULD BE! Reader (R)
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree