A CALL was made last night by one of Scotland's most senior and
respected Judges for the reintroduction of the death penalty to act as a
deterrent against the recent upsurge of murders.
Lord Ross, the Lord Justice Clerk, spoke in defence of bringing back
capital punishment for ''certain murders''.
When interviewed on Scottish Television, he did not specify which kind
would fall into this category. But some hours later he defined a small
list.
Lord Ross admitted that, being realistic, he saw no prospect of any
action taking place in this country, despite the sharp rise in murders
in Strathclyde alone this year to more than 65 in the first six months.
Furthermore, he conceded that his forthright views on the subject were
in a minority within the current Scottish legal system, and differed
greatly from those expressed by the majority of other Judges.
At his home in Edinburgh last night, Lord Ross defended his decision
to speak out in favour of the death penalty. The public had a
''legitimate interest'' in the subject.
He told The Herald that he believed that capital punishment could be
satisfactorily introduced for a ''small category of murders'', namely
the killing of a policeman, a prison officer, acts of terrorism, and
possibly for multiple killings such as those of the Yorkshire Ripper.
However, the Lord Justice Clerk emphasised that he accepted that it
was ''not realistic'' to expect its reintroduction in the wake of the
recent miscarriages of justices experienced in the English law courts.
Nevertheless, while he recognised such instances, describing them as
''exceptional cases'', the Judge told The Herald that ''there was not a
doubt in every murder case''.
Lord Ross maintained that his comments on such a controversial matter
were of a personal nature, and not the official view of the judiciary.
The comments made by Lord Ross, widely regarded as one of the
country's leading Judges with more than 15 years' experience on the
bench, found little support elsewhere.
After the television interview Mr Menzies Campbell, QC, the Liberal
Democrats' legal affairs spokesman in Scotland, voiced his total
opposition to the reintroduction of hanging, particularly as any
injustice could not be remedied.
He commented: ''I have very considerable respect for Lord Ross, with
whom I used to work closely when he was at the Bar, but I totally
disagree with the suggestion that there are any circumstances which
justify the death penalty.
''Recent events in English courts show just how dangerous the
reintroduction of hanging could be. Any injustice could never be
remedied.''
During the television interview, Lord Ross warned that the recent
upsurge in the numbers of serious crimes and assaults being committed
within our towns and cities was placing a ''great strain'' on the
Scottish legal system.
His backing of the death penalty, Lord Ross continued, was based on
the opinion that dire punishment would act as a deterrent. ''One would
think that, if someone knew he was liable to be executed if his crime
was detected, he might at least pause or hesitate before taking the
extreme step of killing someone.''
The Judge explained that the judicial system in Scotland was only
barely able to meet the current demands being placed on it through the
use of temporary and retired Judges.
Despite recent Government help and the recruitment of an additional
Judge to the bench, Lord Ross commented: ''We are able to cope at the
moment with the greatest difficulty, but we are undeniably going to need
additional resources if matters continue as they are.''
He spoke also of his concern at the substantial part played in the
majority of crimes by alcohol and drugs. ''I have been a Judge for 15
years and it is difficult to recall any case of serious assault where
alcohol has not featured,'' Lord Ross said.
While the capital punishment call might find favour with many of
Scotland's rank and file police officers, their official spokesmen have
tended to distance themselves from the restoration argument.
At recent conferences of both the Scottish Police Federation and
Superintendents' Association, the calls have become more muted because
there appears to be an acceptance that Parliament will never allow
restoration of the death penalty under a free vote and that other
measures must be pursued.
One of Scotland's leading criminal lawyers, Mr Joe Beltrami, voiced
his opposition to the introduction of the death penalty and dismissed
the argument by Lord Ross that it would act as a deterrent.
Mr Beltrami has defended 12 capital murder charges during his career.
He said: ''I feel that its introduction would result in a greater
number of incidents of acquittal. The chances are that a jury will not
convict because of the drastic consequences, and the incidents of
acquittal would be increased if the death penalty was in place.
Lord Hope, the Lord President, was out of the country and unavailable
for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article