EDITOR'S CHOICE NEWS Zim broadcasters: we will continue Homes are left empty for six months Record crowds at schools’ art show SPORT Wood's cracking pre-season schedule Fans urged to back Wood SAVE ELSTREE POST OFFICE Sign our petition against the closure of Elstree post office PAUL WELSH Fangs for the memories TRAVEL FEATURES Austria, without the skis The new centre of Europe FEATURES Pulled from the wreckage VOTE Do you think the roadworks in Shenley Road will make a positive difference to the town? Read more Yes No Yes, but not enough GET OUR NEWS BY E-MAIL Just register

Most read Comments 1 Update: Work will end the 'walk of shame' 2 Homes are left empty for six months 3 Zim broadcasters: we will continue 4 Record crowds at schools’ art show 5 Low country highlights 6 McRobber jailed for knife attacks 7 £2m to improve county’s roads 8 Waste van drivers accused of driving wrong way down one-way street 9 Plans approved for better patient care 10 Wood get home draw in FA Cup Today | 7 Days 1 Business owner vows to fight demolition decision 2 We need to keep the faith 3 Seminar discusses how to help young ex-offenders 4 Update: Work will end the 'walk of shame' 5 Question Balls about closures 6 £2m to improve county’s roads 7 Waste van drivers accused of driving wrong way down one-way street 8 Open day gives behind-the-scenes look at Borehamwood's emergency services 9 Basketball hoop bounced from plans for play area 10 Schools minister opens Yavneh College

Comment

Last week there was a letter in this paper from Councillor Morris Bright which presented his own personal political view on the history of Woodcock Hill (Lobbying gets results, Opinion, May 2).

For the record, the Labour group rejected "safeguarding" for Woodcock Hill in 1997 preferring to keep the land as designated green belt land.

Back then the Labour group thought a policy of safeguarding was wrong.

The group also believed the original green belt status was much more likely to preserve the area from development.

It's a matter of record that it was much later, in 2002, that the Conservative-controlled council actually put the land into safeguarded status.

The Labour group's position (of which I was a member) was then, as it is now, that this area should be protected from development and should remain in the green belt.

We find it odd that the notoriously "anti-political" figure of Mr Bright should wish to characterise our position on this matter at odds from the facts.

Leon Reefe

Badgers Close, Borehamwood

9:15am Friday 9th May 2008

Print

Email this

Comment

Add your comment

Name:
Email: *
Location:
**
	e.g. 123-123
Comment: Please note: All HTML tags will be ignored. Format Text:
By posting a comment, I confirm that I have read and agree to the terms of use. Comments are not moderated but we will react if anything that breaks the rules comes to our attention and we may delete inappropriate postings. Please treat other people with respect. You must not post anything that is abusive, indecent, unlawful or defamatory. Remember, you are personally liable for what you post on this site. If you wish to complain about a comment, contact us here.
* Your email address will not be displayed ** To avoid register now or login